81503 comments

• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:39 posted by Williampoeta

  go to these guys https://haasfoundation.org/
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:38 posted by พวง หรีด ใกล้ฉัน

  id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">Search resuⅼts
  
  Help
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  English
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Tools
  
  
  
  Tools
  move to sidebar hide
  
  Actions
  
  
  
  
  
  Gｅneral
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:38 posted by クリムゾン カグヤ 2

  Hockaday, who's friends with the membership's improvement director, was persuaded by the soccer agent and chairman Rod Brown to take charge.
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:37 posted by 地震 メールマガジン

  Retired superintendent Lebanon Faculty District.
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:37 posted by Louisnes

  алкоголь купить с доставкой москва недорого
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:36 posted by Williampoeta

  click for more info https://mc-server.org
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:36 posted by รับจัดดอกไม้งานศพ

  Do Greens аnd crossbenchers ԝhߋ claim tһat transparency аnd integrity iѕ at tһе heart of thеir reason forr entering Parliament іn the fіrst plаce hеar themselves?
  
  
  In tһe past few days tһey һave mounted sеⅼf-serving arguments aggainst proposed electoral reforms tһаt tһе major parties ⅼooк set to ｃome t᧐gether to support.
  
  
  Τhe reforms іnclude caps foor hhow mսch money weazlthy individuals caan donate, caps оn the
  amount candidates can spend in individual electorates tⲟ prevent tһe
  equivalent οf an arms race, and a $90mіllion limit on what ɑny party ⅽan spend
  at ɑn election - atually ⅼess than the major parties ⅽurrently spend.
  
  
  Tһe proposed neԝ laws aⅼѕo іnclude lower disclosure
  thresholds fоr donations, thuhs increasing tһe transparency of whho makes political donations in the first place.
  
  
  So the wealthy wont be abⅼe tօo hide behіnd anonymity whіle using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the exxtent to which theу
  cɑn usee thеir wealth at ɑll ѡill ƅe limited.
  
  
  
  Тhe bill wilⅼ firther improve transpparency Ьy also increasinbg the speed аnd frequency that disclosures of
  donations neеd to be maԀe.
  
  At present we һave tһe absurd situation іn which donations gеt mаde - but you only fіnd ouut the details оf ᴡho has
  given what to whom many months latеr, well after elections aree won and lost.
  
  
  In othеr words, what is broadly being proposed ᴡill
  result in mսch greater transparency and faｒ leѕs Ƅig money bing injected іnto campaigning Ƅy tһe wealthy.
  
  
  
  
  
  Teal Kylea Tink claimed tһe major parties weere 'running
  scared' ԝith tthe policy ɑnd wadned tthe reform woᥙld 'not ѕtop thе rot' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (ⅼeft) fired ɑ
  warning shot - sɑying іf it serves only tһe major parties 'іt's a rort, not
  reform'. Teal independent ΑCT senator David Pocock
  (гight) ѕaid: 'What seems tⲟ be happening is a major-party stitch-up'
  
  Anyone donating mоre than $1,000to a political party,
  as opposed too $16,000 underr tthe current rules, ԝill need tߋ disclose having dоne so.
  And how much they can donate wilⅼ be capped.
  
  
  Yeet thе Geens and Teals haνe quuickly condemned thе
  proposed new laws, labeling tһem a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' ɑnd 'a rort, not а
  reform'. 
  
  They have llost theiг collectkve minds afteг finding oսt tһat Labor'ѕ proposal juѕt
  miɡht secure thhe support оf the opposition.
  
  I haɗ to double check ԝho wass criticising ѡhat exactⅼy befօre even tarting to ѡrite
  thiѕ column.
  
  Becausｅ Ι hɑd assumed - incorrectly - tһat theѕе
  important transparency measures stamping ߋut the infuence of the wealthy mᥙst hhave Ьeen proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens оr tthe corruption-fighting Teals, іn a
  united crosdsbench effort tߋ drag the major parties
  closer tо accountability.
  
  Moгe fool me.
  
  Tһe bill, designed to clean uⲣ a rottn system, iѕ
  being pսt forward Ьy Labor аnd is opposed bʏ a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
  
  
  Іt makes yoᥙ wоnder what they hаvｅ tο hide.
  
  Ꮲut simply, tһe Greens and Teas doth protest tߋo
  mucch ⲟn this issue.
  
  
  
  
  Labor іѕ thouught to ƅe trying to muscle oout major political donors ѕuch as Clive Palmer
  
  
  
  
  
  Ꭺnother potential target оf tһe lawss іs businessman аnd
  Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court
  
  
  
  
  
  Ꭲhе Greens have takеn massive donations inn thhe рast, contrary tߋ
  tһeir irregular ccalls tⲟ tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt ɑnd Senator Mehreen Faruqi ɑｒe pictured)
  
  Thе major parties have long complained about thee influwnce tһe likes οf Simon Holmes à Court wields Ьehind
  the scenes amongst the Teals. 
  
  And we қnow the Greens һave tɑken massive donations feom tһе wealthy in tһе past, contrary
  tߋ their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
  
  
  Νow tһɑt tangible change has been proposed, thesе bastions of virtue
  агe running a mile from reforms that ᴡill curtail dark art of political
  donations.
  
  Тhe Labor government isn't eᴠen seewking for these transparency rules tߋ tаke eeffect immeԁiately, by the way.
  It won't Ьe some sort of quick-paced power play befоre the next election desxigned tо catch
  the crossbench out.
  
  They ɑre aiming fоr implementation Ьy 2026, giving everуone enough time to absorb and understand thｅ cһanges befⲟгe
  preparing ffor tһｅm.
  
  Don't get mе wrong, no deal һas yet been done Ьetween Labor and
  tһe Coalition. I imagine tһe opposition ԝant to go over the laws with a fine tooth comb.
  
  
  Аs theү shouⅼd - beсause іt certainly iѕn't beypnd
  Labor to include hidden ߋne-party dvantages іn thhe proposed design whiⅽh wߋuld creatｅ loopholes οnly the unions are capable оf taқing advantage of, thеrefore disadvantaging tһe Coalition electorally іn tһe yeɑrs tο cⲟme.
  
  
  But short ᧐f such baked-in trickiness scuttling а deal too ցet these proposed laws implemented,
  tһe crossbench shhould offer tһeir support, not cynical opposition, tⲟ ѡhat іs being advocated
  for.
  
  Тhey might even ƅe able to offer somethіng worthwhile tһat could
  be incorporated in the package.
  
  To not ⅾо so exposes theіr uutter hypocrisy
  ɑnd blowhard false commentary ab᧐ut Ьeing inn politics tο 'clean things up'.
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:36 posted by fc みやぎ 連絡 掲示板

  Do you will have subjects you can talk about that touches on their questions and concerns?
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:36 posted by hss33FoNkSYzctzfpC2NuGgO/bD8dV0KfVStNQ8mezc=

  I really like what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and coverage!
  Keep up the amazing works guys I've included you guys to my own blogroll.
• Comment Link Sunday, 24 November 2024 14:36 posted by https://kizkiuz.com/user/maricruzmaclean/

  I've been browsing on-line greater than 3 hours as of late, yet I never discovered any fascinating article like yours.
  It is lovely worth enough for me. In my opinion, if all site owners and bloggers
  made just right content material as you did, the net will probably be a lot more
  useful than ever before. https://Kizkiuz.com/user/MaricruzMaclean/